The Daniel Penny case, involving the chokehold death of Jordan Neely, continues to provoke significant public debate as the criminal trial faces hurdles and a civil lawsuit emerges.
Manslaughter Charge Dismissed
Jurors in Penny’s trial informed the court twice that they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, despite prolonged deliberations. The judge dismissed the charge, shifting focus to the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide, which carries a maximum sentence of four years. This is in contrast to the 15 years Penny could have faced for manslaughter.
Jurors reviewed critical evidence, including police interviews, bodycam footage, and testimony from the medical examiner, Dr. Cynthia Harris, who attributed Neely’s death to “compression of the neck.” The jury also sought clarification on legal definitions such as “recklessness” and “negligence.”
Civil Lawsuit Filed by Jordan Neely’s Father
As the criminal case unfolds, Jordan Neely’s father, Andre Zachary, filed a civil lawsuit accusing Penny of negligence and assault and battery, asserting that his actions directly caused Neely’s death. The suit seeks damages exceeding the jurisdictional limits of lower courts. Zachary’s legal team characterized the death as “preventable and unnecessary,” accusing Penny of reckless behavior.
In response, Penny’s lawyer, Steven Raiser, dismissed the lawsuit as a strategic distraction aimed at undermining Penny’s credibility during the ongoing criminal proceedings.
Competing Narratives in Court
- Prosecution’s Argument: Prosecutors assert that Penny’s chokehold lasted approximately six minutes and caused Neely’s death. They argue that while Penny may have intended to protect subway riders, his actions were excessive and reckless.
- Defense’s Argument: Penny’s team argues that Neely’s death resulted from other factors, including synthetic marijuana (K2), schizophrenia, and a genetic condition. A defense witness challenged the medical examiner’s conclusion, claiming the chokehold was not the primary cause of death. Penny testified that his actions were a response to Neely’s erratic behavior, which included verbal threats.
Social and Cultural Ramifications
This case highlights broader societal issues, including:
- Race and Class Dynamics: The racial contrast between Penny, a White Marine veteran, and Neely, a Black homeless man, has amplified scrutiny, with many arguing the incident reflects systemic biases.
- Mental Health and Public Safety: Neely’s erratic behavior was symptomatic of untreated mental illness, underscoring the challenges of addressing mental health in public spaces.
- Homelessness: The incident spotlights the vulnerability of homeless individuals and the societal failure to provide adequate support systems.
What’s Next?
As the criminal trial progresses with deliberations on the lesser charge, the civil lawsuit signals prolonged legal battles ahead. Beyond the courtroom, the case has sparked a national reckoning over justice, accountability, and the intersection of race, mental health, and public safety. The discourse surrounding these themes ensures the case will remain a focal point in public debate for the foreseeable future.
Other Articles
In the Diddy lawsuit, Jay-Z is accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
